10 Things You Should Know About Hitler: Predictions From The Atlantic in 1932
In 1932, Hitler had not yet taken power in Germany. But he was close.
What would happen to Germany if the Nazis were to rule? That was a question that had a surprisingly easy answer. In the March issue of The Atlantic, Nicolas Fairweather wrote “Hitler and Hitlerism: A Man of Destiny.” In it, he analyzed Hitler and his philosophy, as derived from a reading of Mein Kampf, “to foreshadow, from [Hitler’s] own statements, some of the things he would like to accomplish.” Journalists, at times, can be horrible predictors of the future. But in this case, Fairweather’s assessment was a sound alarm. He summarizes Hitler in 10 points:
Read more. [Image: AP]1. His violent racial nationalism, which springs from his conviction that the Aryan stocks in general, and the Germans in particular, are a chosen people in whose victorious survival the divine purposes are bound up.
2. His violent animosity to Marxian Socialism as in essence opposed to his ideal of a nationally minded people and a racial state. …
3. His violent hatred of the Jews as the racial enemies of all Aryans, the subtle corrupters of pure Aryan states. These parasites, says Hitler, have made Marxian Socialism, which they invented, the principal tool by which they insinuate themselves into healthy, pure blooded, racial states in order to debase simultaneously the national ideals and the national blood. Destroyers of Aryan civilizations, they remain impotent to create a civilization of their own.
172 Notes/ Hide
-
paulloved reblogged this from theatlantic
-
elmojorfjord reblogged this from theatlantic
-
418852 likes this
-
zacliveshere reblogged this from charlesemerson
-
charlesemerson reblogged this from theatlantic
-
asoftskeleton likes this
-
take1xtie1xday likes this
-
yilovesbeautifulthings reblogged this from theatlantic
-
90smusicrocks reblogged this from theatlantic
-
rossmg likes this
-
zanjir likes this
-
indierock413 likes this
-
the-koala-wolf reblogged this from polarbearmode
-
polarbearmode reblogged this from theatlantic
-
elvis-shrugged likes this
-
tooksby likes this
-
kubrech reblogged this from backshootingford
-
kubrech likes this
-
elmojorfjord likes this
-
backshootingford reblogged this from theatlantic
-
love-of-history reblogged this from theatlantic
-
southernphimu reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
Love History
-
dimwen likes this
-
porcelain-lenore reblogged this from theatlantic
-
historicalfactblog reblogged this from theatlantic
-
ten-twenty-nine likes this
-
michaelondrovich reblogged this from theatlantic
-
roavl likes this
-
annielaurie likes this
-
sonic15g reblogged this from theatlantic
-
picturesofwar likes this
-
vertigoremedy likes this
-
midnight-59 likes this
-
kizzyannmarie reblogged this from theatlantic
-
postcardsfromari likes this
-
theuselessdiary reblogged this from theatlantic
-
weightedhearts likes this
-
ghost-of-algren likes this
-
starry-dreamer likes this
-
artemisasmoon reblogged this from thusiashinystar
-
meganlives likes this
-
thusiashinystar reblogged this from theatlantic
-
artemisasmoon likes this
-
damara-fucking-megido reblogged this from heroesofspace
-
cephalopods4peace likes this
-
asthepoemsgo likes this
-
lnicodemus likes this
-
gangofone likes this
-
trotskitty reblogged this from theatlantic
- Show more notes
![theatlantic:
10 Things You Should Know About Hitler: Predictions From The Atlantic in 1932
In 1932, Hitler had not yet taken power in Germany. But he was close.
What would happen to Germany if the Nazis were to rule? That was a question that had a surprisingly easy answer. In the March issue of The Atlantic, Nicolas Fairweather wrote “Hitler and Hitlerism: A Man of Destiny.” In it, he analyzed Hitler and his philosophy, as derived from a reading of Mein Kampf, “to foreshadow, from [Hitler’s] own statements, some of the things he would like to accomplish.” Journalists, at times, can be horrible predictors of the future. But in this case, Fairweather’s assessment was a sound alarm. He summarizes Hitler in 10 points:
1. His violent racial nationalism, which springs from his conviction that the Aryan stocks in general, and the Germans in particular, are a chosen people in whose victorious survival the divine purposes are bound up.
2. His violent animosity to Marxian Socialism as in essence opposed to his ideal of a nationally minded people and a racial state. …
3. His violent hatred of the Jews as the racial enemies of all Aryans, the subtle corrupters of pure Aryan states. These parasites, says Hitler, have made Marxian Socialism, which they invented, the principal tool by which they insinuate themselves into healthy, pure blooded, racial states in order to debase simultaneously the national ideals and the national blood. Destroyers of Aryan civilizations, they remain impotent to create a civilization of their own.
Read more. [Image: AP]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2sjfpWlvs1qcokc4o1_1280.jpg)